Agnes Monica & Allah Peduli

Mar 16th, 2009, in Celebrities, News, by

Agnes Monica & Allah PeduliAgnes Monica annoys Malaysians for unusual reasons, with her new hit song Allah Peduli.

The province of Selangor in Malaysia has banned pop singer Agnes Monica’s latest tune “Allah Peduli” (God Cares) because of its use of the term “Allah” to refer to the Christian God, possibly including Jesus Christ/Jesus of Nazareth/the prophet Isa.

Mohamad Adzib Mohd Isa, the head of the Religious Court in Selangor, says the song must not be played or sung anywhere in the province. Non-Muslims who say “Allah” to refer to their god(s) are subject to a 1,000 ringgit (about $300) penalty, he says. antara

Agnes Monica
Our Agnes

There has been a long-running dispute in Malaysia as to whether non-Muslims, particularly Christians, are permitted to say “Allah” for “God”. The dispute began when authorities objected to the Catholic daily the Herald using the word, with this case currently going through the courts.

Meanwhile, the offensive song, Allah Peduli by Agnes Monica:


255 Comments on “Agnes Monica & Allah Peduli”

  1. Cukurungan says:

    The reason incest is taboo is not because ‘God said so’, but because it is detrimental to human survival. It corrupts the raising of children and leads to genetic disorders

    I will give you a solution remove the burden about genetic disorder,
    please use condom properly, Do the incest is just for pure pleasing each other and not for the breeding purpose …Now…Is it incest OK for you?

  2. Burung Koel says:

    Do the incest is just for pure pleasing each other and not for the breeding purpose …Now…Is it incest OK for you?

    @ Cukie

    You are really quite intractable. Mike O. and I have tried to explain this to you three times, but you fail to understand. Please go back and read again what has been put to you.

    I can conclude that your own religious faith is so weak, that you need to think of all non-believers as promoters of incest. In fact, there are many studies that suggest that incest is actually more common in fundamentalist religious families, of all persuasions.

  3. Mr Tic Tac Toe says:

    Tn. Cukurungan, Yth:

    Pheromones.

    Just like you wont fall in love to other men’s pheromones, you wont fall in love to your sister’s pheromones.

    Siblings pheromones are repulsive towards each other. Unless your brains are wired differently.

    I read that long ago somewhere in yahoo, but im too lazy to research now.

  4. schmerly says:

    @ Cukie.. Why are you always on about the white predator in Australia? how about the two million or so Asians that live there, are they also predators ?

    Cukie, why is it in your posts you always seem to go on about, paedophilia and incest Etc., I wonder what your fascination is with these subjects?

  5. Mike Oxblack says:

    I will give you a solution remove the burden about genetic disorder,

    Wow! How ya gonna do that then? Are you a research geneticist by any chance?

    In other word Taboo is non-logical thing

    Taboo noun (pl. taboos or tabus) a social or religious custom placing prohibition or restriction on a particular thing or person. …nothing about it being illogical or irrational. In fact , in many cases taboos are a highly rational and logical prohibition. In this case (incest) it’s also highly rational (recessive genes, inbreeding, Prince Charles ears) and thus a moral prohibition against it would arise quite naturally in an evolved morality (and biology as TTT pointed out with his pheremones)

    Of course gun and stuff is important for survival but the most important thing is the aboriginal has no strong religius doctrine like us to counter the religius doctrine brought up by the invader

    Coz’ Buddhism, Hinduism and Islam originated in Java didn’t they? In fact Aborigines have a whole raft of traditional beliefs.

  6. Cukurungan says:

    @ Cukie

    You are really quite intractable. Mike O. and I have tried to explain this to you three times, but you fail to understand. Please go back and read again what has been put to you.

    I can conclude that your own religious faith is so weak, that you need to think of all non-believers as promoters of incest. In fact, there are many studies that suggest that incest is actually more common in fundamentalist religious families, of all persuasions.

    Ok read again my posting carefully and completely, but if if you fell shy to give me an answer openly in this forum, it is ok with me

    Wow! How ya gonna do that then? Are you a research geneticist by any chance?

    Actually I hate to repeat and repeat my posting but you seemed so blind ……let me repeat again …. use condom properly and do the incest just for pleasing each other not for breeding…tell me what is the logical explantion will hold you not committing the incest if it is just for fun only.

    @ Cukie.. Why are you always on about the white predator in Australia? how about the two million or so Asians that live there, are they also predators ?

    Cukie, why is it in your posts you always seem to go on about, paedophilia and incest Etc., I wonder what your fascination is with these subjects?

    I thank you that finally you follow one of our recommendation to replace your gravartar… tell me…when you are going to wear SARONG adn PECI to improve your image.

  7. Burung Koel says:

    Seriously, man, go and see a doctor. You are a danger to yourself as well as others.

  8. Mr Tic Tac Toe says:

    Tn. Cukurungan, Yth:

    tell me what is the logical explantion will hold you not committing the incest if it is just for fun only.

    Aiyoohh dude, search sikit laarrr. Pheromones!

    Look, look, here i quote:

    Other studies have suggested that people might be using odor cues associated with the immune system to select mates who are not closely related to themselves.

    Another similar theory:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_histocompatibility_complex#MHC_and_sexual_selection

    and this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claus_Wedekind

    Or if its too difficult to understand, i have simpler words:
    Normally, we dont do incest becoz it stinks.

  9. Mike Oxblack says:

    Actually I hate to repeat and repeat my posting but you seemed so blind ……let me repeat again …. use condom properly and do the incest just for pleasing each other not for breeding…tell me what is the logical explantion will hold you not committing the incest if it is just for fun only.

    Exactly TTT. The logical explanation is that the taboo remains deep within our mental and physical biology having evolved that way. This being the case only a small amount of deviants (such as yourself perhaps Cukie) are going to be interested in committing incest, condoms or no condoms. In the same vein (no pun intended), we also have a strong urge to procreate. The fact that I use condoms and don’t procreate doesn’t stop me getting the horn and shagging birds. Thankyou.

  10. Mike Oxblack says:

    Actually TTT the science of pheromones is very interesting. I saw a programme on TV in which random males smelled T shirts that had been worn by random females. The males most preferred the scent of T shirts worn by women who were genetically the least similar to them. So our sexual preferences have evolved, via pheromones, to stir the gene pool.

  11. schmerly says:

    saw a programme on TV in which random males smelled T shirts that had been worn by random females.

    Uumm! interesting, and I thought most males liked to smell other intimate items of women’s apparel! or am I alone in thinking this?

    @ Cukie.. Instead of rattling on, answer my two questions yeah! or are you once again going to hide behind your mothers skirt as soon as your confronted.

  12. schmerly says:

    @ Cukie..

    use condom properly and do the incest just for pleasing each other not for breeding

    Are you speaking from experience??

  13. Suryo Perkoso says:

    Mr Tic Tac Toe Says:

    March 30th, 2009 at 1:57 pm
    Tn. Cukurungan, Yth:

    tell me what is the logical explantion will hold you not committing the incest if it is just for fun only.

    Aiyoohh dude, search sikit laarrr. Pheromones!

    Look, look, here i quote:

    Other studies have suggested that people might be using odor cues associated with the immune system to select mates who are not closely related to themselves.

    Another similar theory:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_histocompatibility_complex#MHC_and_sexual_selection

    and this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claus_Wedekind

    Or if its too difficult to understand, i have simpler words:
    Normally, we dont do incest becoz it stinks.

    You have been doing quite well up ’till now – firstly please don’t fall into the trap of attempting to shorten “because” to “becoz” in the vague hope it may look cool, becuase it doesn’t – trust me on this, there is a partcularly vile and thick Pole of my aquaintance who is not capable of creating a sentence without “ur” and “m8” etc.

    Now, back to the plot- if incest stinks, suggest you try a different hole, you have got your plumbing around the wrong way.

  14. Suryo Perkoso says:

    schmerly Says:

    March 30th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
    saw a programme on TV in which random males smelled T shirts that had been worn by random females.

    Uumm! interesting, and I thought most males liked to smell other intimate items of women’s apparel! or am I alone in thinking this?

    @ Cukie.. Instead of rattling on, answer my two questions yeah! or are you once again going to hide behind your mothers skirt as soon as your confronted.

    Yes, that figures. I can just see you lurking behind the laundry basket with a pair of used trollies over your head, knocking a quick one off.

    It’s quite clear that “incest” and “buggery” have been confused on this post – over to the resident potholing enthusiast Mr. Mike Oxblack.

  15. Burung Koel says:

    Hey guys, I wasn’t joking before. I sense a few mental health problems with our friend Cukie. Might not be a good idea to pile it on.

  16. andrey says:

    Apparently you people failed to comprehend what Mr. Cukurungan said:
    If the argument is that the taboo against incest is just to protect against having idiot child, then what about incest with condom? No danger of having idiot child. So is this kind of incest OK?

    So eventually if you still want to keep the taboo, you have to resort to some non scientific reason, which is religion.

  17. DumadiSatrio says:

    Hi guys,

    Figured I’d just drop in to explain what everyone is saying real quick…before this goes on for 3 more days…..

    Mas Cukurungan is saying that the Taboo against incest is the reason that people find it gross. That without the social and religious taboos people would find nothing disgusting about having sex with their mother. Any instinctive reaction of it being disgusting, is a result of the taboo.

    Mas Burung Koel is saying that the taboo developed from the fact that it was naturally gross to us. He uses the fact that pheromones play an important role in our sexual attractions.

    ——————– Now My two cents—————————-
    Guess what?
    You are both half right.

    The factors that made something like incest a gross are both natural reason, social reasons, psychological reasons.
    The psychological reasons are the most significant.

    Also, Taboo is the wrong word.
    Things like incest and pedophilia (and many of the other philias) are psychological disorders. It is not a matter of taboo.

    Think for a second…… Would YOU, if there were no social/cultural/religious ramifications, want to have sex with your mom?

    I know I wouldnt! It has nothing to do with taboo, society, or religion….it has to do with the way our minds wire different relationships. And while social influence plays a role in how we develope these, it is not a sole factor.

    In closing, people who are not having sex with their parents and little children…do not avoid it out of fear of taboos….they avoid it for the same reason I avoid playing with dog feces….. It is disgusting, and I dont have a psychological disorder that overrides that disgust.

  18. diego says:

    I don’t know,

    I kind of agree to that pheromone theory. What attracts me to another guy is, I think (?), the aroma (but, of course, then come the physic and personality 😀 ). Is that pheromone?

  19. Aluang Anak Bayang says:

    Most ‘real’ Javanese posters like myself learnt our English from pirated American movies VCD; yet we are able to debate like English literati. If you try to discredit non-English speakers’ spelling and grammar, or pretend you misread, make sure you write flawless English yourself.

    To my understanding, below is what sheikh Cuk was trying to relay.

    Quote,
    ‘Homosexuality’ was taboo and banned in the past. But in these days because of western idea of freedom of individuality, gay rights, etc; homosexuality is now legal with the excuse that as long as both sides are consenting adults.

    Same can be said of ‘incest’. Sooner or later, the western worlds will try to legalise incestuous relationship with the excuse that as long as both sides are consenting adults. If you think it will procreate idiotic babies, Cuk recommended condom.
    Unquote.

  20. ET says:

    andrey said

    So eventually if you still want to keep the taboo, you have to resort to some non scientific reason, which is religion.

    You seem to suffer from one-dimensionalism. With you it’s either this or that. Us or them. As if there could be no other reasons for taboos to be respected like social structures, even esthetics, all qualities that evolution has proved to be beneficial for the human condition.

  21. andrey says:

    this so called pheromon theory failed to stop people from legalizing homosexuality.
    so if we start accomodating people with special set of hormons that make them attracted to same sexes, why not accomodate those with an incest hormons?

  22. andrey says:

    et, things like social structures, esthetic perception, popularity, and any other qualities defined without an absolute, unchangeable set of values, are changing with time, so will anything defined based on that. Look at the western world. Compared to the 17th century, how many social taboos are gone now? what makes you think that the incest taboo is special?

    if we all agree that some taboo should not change forever, we should base it on something that dont change: God’s law.

  23. Mike Oxblack says:

    Simple. Homosexuals can’t procreate. Incest can (Prince Charles ears…again…). It’s so obvious I shouldn’t really have to spell it out. Christ on a three speed bleeding moped. You two understand simply nothing about natural selection and evolution. We have evolved from earlier organisms. Genes you see…passed on. Fact. Understandable from monotheists though I guess…are you American…?.

  24. DumadiSatrio says:

    speaking of unchangeable set of values

    In much of the world today, it is considered incest for 1st cousins to marry. I know that in the west and east asia, it is very looked down upon.
    However, In the middle east and south asia, intermarriage between 1st cousins is very common, even among the wealthy and educated.

    using absolutes, should the taboo over 1st cousin incest be lifted or expanded?

  25. Mike Oxblack says:

    What doesn’t change Andrey? The fact that we are made out of Diribonucleic acid. That doesn’t change you see. gay people can’t make a kid. Do you see? Clearly not…

  26. schmerly says:

    @ Bodoh Perkoso..

    Yes, that figures. I can just see you lurking behind the laundry basket with a pair of used trollies over your head, knocking a quick one off.

    Yeah OK whatever turns you on. It was a joke!!

  27. schmerly says:

    @ AssmadsAngryBitch..

    Most ‘real’ Javanese posters like myself learnt our English from pirated American movies VCD; yet we are able to debate like English literati.

    You are not a real Javanese for a start, and your so called English is CRAP! OK!!

  28. DumadiSatrio says:

    ps…….wow……how did this become a debate over incest?
    Haha, I think that’s why I like this forum, more tangents then a triganomotry class

  29. Aluang Anak Bayang says:

    @ schmerly [sic]

    Where happened to the distressed, sexually abused young boy on your avatar?

  30. DumadiSatrio says:

    @schmerly: Why you always so angry with Pak AAB?

Comment on “Agnes Monica & Allah Peduli”.

Copyright Indonesia Matters 2006-2025
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact