Indonesia’s unique interpretation of human rights in respect of freedom of choice in religion, and secularism.
Professor Dr. Suyahmo of the Universitas Negeri Semarang (Unnes) said recently that human rights are basically universal and applicable to all but will take different forms in practical terms in each country, according to differing circumstances, history and culture.
Every country is free to determine human rights values in accordance with their ideology.
Because of this human rights in Indonesia would be different than in other countries, for example in the area of religion.
In secular countries people are free to adopt whatever religion they want, or none at all.
But Indonesia was founded on the Pancasila doctrine and it required that all citizens belong to a particular religion. However the country did allow people to choose which religion they wished to belong to, although the fact that this choice was limited to only six officially recognised faiths, they being Islam, Protestantism, Catholicism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Confucianism, was a violation of human rights, he said. beritasore
Hi Lairedion,
That you’re only allowed a choice of 6 religions is a misconception (and it seems like people are missing my point earlier). The Constitution does not even require you to have any religion. It is just a popular interpretation that says that people must have one.
Furthermore, Indonesia is a secular nation; this is because we have a self-contained Constitution: it has no dependence on a particular religion that will allow values or rules from that religion to be automatically converted to a cilvil law.
Social expectation is something different. Socially, Indonesian people are quite religious. It’s just their current way of life. But who knows, people may change.
Primarydrive, dream on.
read it again: it clearly says: “Atas berkat Rahmat Allah…” Allah, not Jesus, not Budda or something else.
which means that this country came into being by the grace of Allah, with out which it wouldnt happen.
Allah, not Jesus, not Buddha or Sang Hyang Widhi Wasa, is the reason of the existence this nation. So said the fore fathers, so it should be.
Ah I can see the big picture now. It IS so simple isnt it? so if other religion can no longer use The Term, then the nation automatically desecularized.
Then, We the liliputians, refuse to call the eggs by some other names. We now understand that we are the last line of defense.
Mbak Audrey,
βAtas berkat Rahmat Allahβ¦β
Here is some clarification:
The speaker was moslem so ‘Atas Berkat Rahmat Allah’ was used. If he was Hindu, he would mention ‘Atas Berkat Rahmat Shiva’. The ‘Allah’ here is not signification as religion is secondary in Indonesia. To outsiders like you, it is a big deal.
Apparently, our founding fathers are all moslem, but that didn’t stop them praying to Tuhan Jesus (like my grandparents in those days, Christian god is called Tuhan Jesus), Tuhan Buddha and Tuhan Hindu. Our past and present Presidents continued the tradition by seeking spiritual guidance from past walis and local deities on auspice occasion. Most of our nation’s heroes and policy makers were/are Javanese moslem. We runs the show, not the uneducated masses.
Dear Lairedion,
Wikipedia is not always accurate. And you can’t seriously conclude whether or not a nation is secular based on its ministerial regulation on KTP. There are lots of lower level regulations that are contradictive to the constitution. This have to change, but we are not going to change anything if don’t even believe that we too have rights; and that the Constitution belong to all of us, not just to some group of people.
And yeah, I’m in IT π I wish I can be a consultant. They seem to make lots of money.
@Lairedion,
You don’t like bosses? Oh shit, I hope you’re not one of those linux zealots. I get the impression those linux kids are annoying, and all they know is “to hate”, blind hatred to microsoft, with all those cliches.
@Lairedion
University and CNET…. π
Dear Lairedion,
Well, if you put it that way then yes, the Constitution is not purely secular. But given our cultural background, it is as secular as you can get. Those parts you pointed out are no real threat, unless we let some right wing parties impose their own medieval interpretation of them. If people do not want this to happen, they should stand up, unite, and vote. Pls don’t tell me that a bunch of illiterate mujaheedins can to outsmart IT consultants in a Democracy game π
Copyright Indonesia Matters 2006-2025
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact
to Audrey and the like:
>Well for starters apostates will go to hell. Are we going to take the risk that he will complain to his God that he went away from the right path because we let him to? and thereby opening ourself to the possibility of having to take his place in hell?<
would you accept, if I said the same applies if someone converts to Islam from Christianity or something else? That he or she will go to hell?
No, you wouldn`nt, right?
That`s why Islam values are not universal as opposed to human rights which you cannot
challenge that easily, because they are based on assumed humanity and not on the self aggrandizement of a certain group.
That is why “negara islam” is a threat to human civilization, because it is based on the assumption that a certain group is to be treated differently from others, very similar with communism and nazism that put the cause of one “class” or “race” against others.
fortunately most indonesian muslims understand that and do not vote religion based political parties, do they?